Saddens me what Dr Malone wrote in his article. He is defending them in a way. Saying the study needs to be done. Before he was placed on ACIP he spoke differently. He is on the defense now as well in his writing. Just like voting yes on the new RSV due to the positive results from Beyfortus. Tell that to the parents that have lost their babies to Beyfortus that are in VAERs. That is no longer a safety signal it would appear for any shot.
Indeed. Hardly a Trumpian response from Trump’s HHS, CDC, FDA, NIH, NIAID regulators and ACIP and VRBPAC panel members that would establish leverage and utilize it for a MAHA outcome of transparency and benefit for the people of America.
Why is it that Pfizer with impunity gets to design and consuct a study that only looks for child myocarditis from its experimental product in a 7-day window that occurs 14 days to 21 days following the second jab?
Everything about this reeks of a coverup. Of premeditation. Of planning, execution, and manipulation of the records. The evidence points to a clear violation of a list of laws the size of an encyclopedia. It also points to just how massive in scope this operation was. How many people were involved. The entire covid injection scheme breaks every rule known to man, and every single one of those involved in this diabolical, satanic plot, including the collaborators in the media, need the Nuremberg treatment. Hanging.
Pfizer in fact has no obligation to conduct this study. BioNTech does because BioNTech is the license holder. The authorization letter laying out this requirement (p. 6) is right here: https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download. It's addressed to BioNTech care of Pfizer because BioNTech appointed Pfizer as its US agent. But the obligation is still BioNTech's. But Pfizer is listed as the sponsor of the study in question. Why is the German company BioNTech being allowed to evade its obligation? Why is The Defender not making an issue of this? Why are Robert Malone and Robert Kennedy not making an issue of this?
Why is it that RFK JR’s CDC has not corrected its atrocious almost fully redacted 148-page March 2024 response to the Epoch Times’ FOIA request asking the rate of myoccarditis in people who received the Covid19 jab, which ought to include the children upon whom the C19 jab medical experiment continues to be authorized?
Such a clown show; they keep tossing bones
Indeed, total clown. 🤡 Peak clown!
It’s astonishing we put up with this garbage.
Saddens me what Dr Malone wrote in his article. He is defending them in a way. Saying the study needs to be done. Before he was placed on ACIP he spoke differently. He is on the defense now as well in his writing. Just like voting yes on the new RSV due to the positive results from Beyfortus. Tell that to the parents that have lost their babies to Beyfortus that are in VAERs. That is no longer a safety signal it would appear for any shot.
Indeed. Hardly a Trumpian response from Trump’s HHS, CDC, FDA, NIH, NIAID regulators and ACIP and VRBPAC panel members that would establish leverage and utilize it for a MAHA outcome of transparency and benefit for the people of America.
Why is it that Pfizer with impunity gets to design and consuct a study that only looks for child myocarditis from its experimental product in a 7-day window that occurs 14 days to 21 days following the second jab?
Why is it that Pfizer gets to avoid publishing interim findings with impunity?
Everything about this reeks of a coverup. Of premeditation. Of planning, execution, and manipulation of the records. The evidence points to a clear violation of a list of laws the size of an encyclopedia. It also points to just how massive in scope this operation was. How many people were involved. The entire covid injection scheme breaks every rule known to man, and every single one of those involved in this diabolical, satanic plot, including the collaborators in the media, need the Nuremberg treatment. Hanging.
Pfizer in fact has no obligation to conduct this study. BioNTech does because BioNTech is the license holder. The authorization letter laying out this requirement (p. 6) is right here: https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download. It's addressed to BioNTech care of Pfizer because BioNTech appointed Pfizer as its US agent. But the obligation is still BioNTech's. But Pfizer is listed as the sponsor of the study in question. Why is the German company BioNTech being allowed to evade its obligation? Why is The Defender not making an issue of this? Why are Robert Malone and Robert Kennedy not making an issue of this?
Why is it that RFK JR’s CDC has not corrected its atrocious almost fully redacted 148-page March 2024 response to the Epoch Times’ FOIA request asking the rate of myoccarditis in people who received the Covid19 jab, which ought to include the children upon whom the C19 jab medical experiment continues to be authorized?
Why is Pfizer allowed with impunity to design a study of an experimental medical intervention for children that lacks an unjabbed control group?