HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. today called out the National Institutes of Health for spending 10 to 20 times more on research into genetic causes of autism than environmental ones.
One of the questions that needs to be asked is: Why do some children who are exposed to environmental toxins (including vaccines) develop a neurological disorders such as autism, while others do not? I'm concerned about Kennedy's statements that genetic factors are not involved in autism. We know from research that there are strong genetic differences for some infants/children with autism. We also know that there are children who live in horrible environmental spaces who do not get autism. I think we need research in genetic areas to better identify infants and children who may have more vulnerable systems. . . and thus, may respond more negatively to environmental triggers of autism. Please remember that research has shown that our genes usually don't "cause" a condition or disease. The key word is "epigenetic". . . something in our environment or lifestyle that activates specific genes. Let's continue with research in autism that may shed some light on genetic characteristics that are more easily triggered by the environment. Please don't support the trap of saying that autism is "caused by" (fill in the blank here. . .) single factors. Everything is interconnected. As a parent and grandparent I want to know more clearly if my child is more likely to have a negative response to a vaccine. I can make a more informed decision of the risks-benefits for this specific child when I am better informed about the genetic programming that is at least one factor in my child that can trigger a damaging response to a specific vaccine.
Yet when you even look up and study what the words chemist and pharmaceutical truly mean, we shouldn't be injecting into our bodies any vaccines whatsoever, as they're only chemical poisons and a comjobulant mixture of animal, insect, human properties that the body was never intended to have injected into it from the very beginning. On top of which, these vaccines were never medicines or ways to protect our childrens bodies or even our own bodies as adults from disease and never have they been.
Suzanne you asked a very good question. Why some children who are exposed to environment risk factor such as a possible vaccine are later on diagnosed with autism and other children even within the same family are not? I hope additional research can answer your question. Is it a number of environmental risk factors or when in a child s development the risk factors are exposed or etc? But I hope this new research is promising. What activates autism ? New Jersey declared autism an epidemic many years ago and one researcher, a clinical psychologist has studied autism extensively, Dr Walter Z from Rutgers University, is involved with Kennedy. I am very optimistic. There has been some genetic predispositions isolated such as paternal age, more males and a hereditary component of autism is in families and etc. I think what Kennedy was stressing is to expand research to the environmental factors too not to just concentrate on genetic. Both are required genetics and environmental but the latter activates the autism diagnosis.
I might have been misinformed, intentionally or otherwise. There's supposedly an herbicide that causes certain amphibians to mutate sexual organs. So maybe it has an effect on other lower vertebrates. Me? No.
So after some deep soul-searching, and a lifetime interest in Greek thought, I realized mitochondrial Eve was being used to cull Christians. If you don't profess that the earth is 5,000 years old and dinosaur fossils were planted by the devil to make us gay, you're not Christian enough. If you do, you're not a threat. Win/win. They gave us the hard sell on population control and tried to outbreed us while Wall Street declared bankruptcy after bankruptcy like all the white people are on preorder for the Martians.
You can't be "born that way," it just works better if you catch 'em early. Gotta get your foot in the door. Rainbow flags, parades, cutting flips down Main Street with their asses out, mandatory so proud of your accomplishment, kindergarten drag queen sex ed storytime, sparing no expense preparing these little blonde kids for their place in the UN's plan for the future of humanity.
Because over there, gay people are free land. It's a real estate futures racket.
My biggest concern with all of this is that it (like most emphases of the media and government) emphasizes a single aspect of the problem (i.e. environment). The media (and Kennedy??) have been talking about language of criticizing research on heredity in autism rather than saying we need to add a greater or equal emphasis on the environmental components. This is not a contest with who wins re; how we spend government funds. It is and should be a collaborative effort to gain a broader and deeper concept of why we are seeing so many children and adults on the autistic spectrum.
One of the questions that needs to be asked is: Why do some children who are exposed to environmental toxins (including vaccines) develop a neurological disorders such as autism, while others do not? I'm concerned about Kennedy's statements that genetic factors are not involved in autism. We know from research that there are strong genetic differences for some infants/children with autism. We also know that there are children who live in horrible environmental spaces who do not get autism. I think we need research in genetic areas to better identify infants and children who may have more vulnerable systems. . . and thus, may respond more negatively to environmental triggers of autism. Please remember that research has shown that our genes usually don't "cause" a condition or disease. The key word is "epigenetic". . . something in our environment or lifestyle that activates specific genes. Let's continue with research in autism that may shed some light on genetic characteristics that are more easily triggered by the environment. Please don't support the trap of saying that autism is "caused by" (fill in the blank here. . .) single factors. Everything is interconnected. As a parent and grandparent I want to know more clearly if my child is more likely to have a negative response to a vaccine. I can make a more informed decision of the risks-benefits for this specific child when I am better informed about the genetic programming that is at least one factor in my child that can trigger a damaging response to a specific vaccine.
Yet when you even look up and study what the words chemist and pharmaceutical truly mean, we shouldn't be injecting into our bodies any vaccines whatsoever, as they're only chemical poisons and a comjobulant mixture of animal, insect, human properties that the body was never intended to have injected into it from the very beginning. On top of which, these vaccines were never medicines or ways to protect our childrens bodies or even our own bodies as adults from disease and never have they been.
He did not say genetic factors are not involved. Watch the press conference again.
Suzanne you asked a very good question. Why some children who are exposed to environment risk factor such as a possible vaccine are later on diagnosed with autism and other children even within the same family are not? I hope additional research can answer your question. Is it a number of environmental risk factors or when in a child s development the risk factors are exposed or etc? But I hope this new research is promising. What activates autism ? New Jersey declared autism an epidemic many years ago and one researcher, a clinical psychologist has studied autism extensively, Dr Walter Z from Rutgers University, is involved with Kennedy. I am very optimistic. There has been some genetic predispositions isolated such as paternal age, more males and a hereditary component of autism is in families and etc. I think what Kennedy was stressing is to expand research to the environmental factors too not to just concentrate on genetic. Both are required genetics and environmental but the latter activates the autism diagnosis.
It’s about time we put 2+2 together
I pray there is a cure
I might have been misinformed, intentionally or otherwise. There's supposedly an herbicide that causes certain amphibians to mutate sexual organs. So maybe it has an effect on other lower vertebrates. Me? No.
So after some deep soul-searching, and a lifetime interest in Greek thought, I realized mitochondrial Eve was being used to cull Christians. If you don't profess that the earth is 5,000 years old and dinosaur fossils were planted by the devil to make us gay, you're not Christian enough. If you do, you're not a threat. Win/win. They gave us the hard sell on population control and tried to outbreed us while Wall Street declared bankruptcy after bankruptcy like all the white people are on preorder for the Martians.
You can't be "born that way," it just works better if you catch 'em early. Gotta get your foot in the door. Rainbow flags, parades, cutting flips down Main Street with their asses out, mandatory so proud of your accomplishment, kindergarten drag queen sex ed storytime, sparing no expense preparing these little blonde kids for their place in the UN's plan for the future of humanity.
Because over there, gay people are free land. It's a real estate futures racket.
Who's following their kids around for decades to see if they're gay?
My biggest concern with all of this is that it (like most emphases of the media and government) emphasizes a single aspect of the problem (i.e. environment). The media (and Kennedy??) have been talking about language of criticizing research on heredity in autism rather than saying we need to add a greater or equal emphasis on the environmental components. This is not a contest with who wins re; how we spend government funds. It is and should be a collaborative effort to gain a broader and deeper concept of why we are seeing so many children and adults on the autistic spectrum.
satans fingerprints are becoming more obvious…
If Only He Would Stop PREP ACT the clowns lose their leverage. Plus he should announce all actors can be sued.
But when will he say what it obviously is
Finally, real science being discussed and New Jersey is involved!!!