Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Suzanne Morris's avatar

One of the questions that needs to be asked is: Why do some children who are exposed to environmental toxins (including vaccines) develop a neurological disorders such as autism, while others do not? I'm concerned about Kennedy's statements that genetic factors are not involved in autism. We know from research that there are strong genetic differences for some infants/children with autism. We also know that there are children who live in horrible environmental spaces who do not get autism. I think we need research in genetic areas to better identify infants and children who may have more vulnerable systems. . . and thus, may respond more negatively to environmental triggers of autism. Please remember that research has shown that our genes usually don't "cause" a condition or disease. The key word is "epigenetic". . . something in our environment or lifestyle that activates specific genes. Let's continue with research in autism that may shed some light on genetic characteristics that are more easily triggered by the environment. Please don't support the trap of saying that autism is "caused by" (fill in the blank here. . .) single factors. Everything is interconnected. As a parent and grandparent I want to know more clearly if my child is more likely to have a negative response to a vaccine. I can make a more informed decision of the risks-benefits for this specific child when I am better informed about the genetic programming that is at least one factor in my child that can trigger a damaging response to a specific vaccine.

Expand full comment
Joseph Gorski's avatar

It’s about time we put 2+2 together

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts