A Florida grand jury found “profound and serious issues involving the process of vaccine development and safety surveillance in the United States,” according to a report unsealed on Tuesday.
The problem with criminal al charges against the rich and powerful is that they often aren't technically committing any crimes...because they've already used that money and power to either rewrite the laws to make their crimes legal and/or written special loopholes into the law so they are legally allowed to do what would land you or me in jail.
Can't count how many times I've had some economic libertarian worshipper of wealth and power sneer that I was out of line calling company like Pfizer or [insert obscenely wealthy and corrupt business or industry here] criminal because "technically" the law absolves them of all criminal or civil liability while carefully avoiding the fact that the corrupt industry wrote that law and paid to pass it. And when they did acknowledge that, they seemed to admire the practice and called me "envious" because you know,there is no other reason one could object to a two tiered justice system that lets rich criminals slide or even rewards them for destroying the lives of others.
Doesn't happen as much post-covid "vaccine" though.
Well said. This is the case with vaccines. They literally created a legal kill box, although there are some exceptions for fraud. For example safe and effective was legally defined as the Secretary of Health and Human Services declared them to be safe and effective, although there was an earlier stage that seemed to require at least one trial showing 50% or more effectiveness. Of course, the trials reaching that target was virtually guaranteed by using different counting windows. One could argue that the counting windows themselves constitute fraud.
I recall them adjusting that 50% thing when the mRNAs fell below to 30% too. Just waiting for the "legal" definition of effective to be "no less than -10%", kind of surprised they haven't redefined effectiveness to include negative efficacy, given the recent studies on the subject.
I missed that. Please send a link if it is easy to find. Nevertheless, my understanding was that after the initial trials and declaration from the Secretary of Health and Human Services they could just hand wave everything else.
God, it was awhile ago, but it was post Biden mandates and on Substack. I'm not sure which stack I saw it on, but it was a tidbit on a whole piece about how they were manipulating the data and redefining words while letting the public still think the words mean something else. It was right around when everyone e cept for the hard-core true believers had realized the efficacy was not there, but the media was still reporting it as effective (but no longer giving numbers to quantify). There were so many many outrages happening that it wasn't even the most egregious one. I'd forgotten about it until now.
That's gonna drive me crazy. Was it on bad cattitude or Steve Kirsch? Or Forgotten Side of Medicine?
Should specify who the target of transparency is. Because they have already argued they didn't hide anything...from the FDA. If they tell everything to their partner in crime who just happens to hide it for them it is supposed to count as "transparancy". That transparency should be due to the American people and NOT a revolving door regulator already in the industry's pocket.
Maybe the didn't find criminal liability in Florida, but there are lawsuits in other states for criminal liability. Maybe Florida needs to look at their laws.
The courts are a pressure release valve to make sure you do not affect the system or the powerful. It is built to exhaust your time, money, and will, so you just give up and leave things alone. I explain deeper with some history of British common-law courts in my podcast here:
It seems like they ruled out criminal charges from the start, making this a half-hearted and cowardly assessment.
The problem with criminal al charges against the rich and powerful is that they often aren't technically committing any crimes...because they've already used that money and power to either rewrite the laws to make their crimes legal and/or written special loopholes into the law so they are legally allowed to do what would land you or me in jail.
Can't count how many times I've had some economic libertarian worshipper of wealth and power sneer that I was out of line calling company like Pfizer or [insert obscenely wealthy and corrupt business or industry here] criminal because "technically" the law absolves them of all criminal or civil liability while carefully avoiding the fact that the corrupt industry wrote that law and paid to pass it. And when they did acknowledge that, they seemed to admire the practice and called me "envious" because you know,there is no other reason one could object to a two tiered justice system that lets rich criminals slide or even rewards them for destroying the lives of others.
Doesn't happen as much post-covid "vaccine" though.
Well said. This is the case with vaccines. They literally created a legal kill box, although there are some exceptions for fraud. For example safe and effective was legally defined as the Secretary of Health and Human Services declared them to be safe and effective, although there was an earlier stage that seemed to require at least one trial showing 50% or more effectiveness. Of course, the trials reaching that target was virtually guaranteed by using different counting windows. One could argue that the counting windows themselves constitute fraud.
I follow all of those, but only some appear on my feed. I’m following more than 250 now.
I recall them adjusting that 50% thing when the mRNAs fell below to 30% too. Just waiting for the "legal" definition of effective to be "no less than -10%", kind of surprised they haven't redefined effectiveness to include negative efficacy, given the recent studies on the subject.
I missed that. Please send a link if it is easy to find. Nevertheless, my understanding was that after the initial trials and declaration from the Secretary of Health and Human Services they could just hand wave everything else.
God, it was awhile ago, but it was post Biden mandates and on Substack. I'm not sure which stack I saw it on, but it was a tidbit on a whole piece about how they were manipulating the data and redefining words while letting the public still think the words mean something else. It was right around when everyone e cept for the hard-core true believers had realized the efficacy was not there, but the media was still reporting it as effective (but no longer giving numbers to quantify). There were so many many outrages happening that it wasn't even the most egregious one. I'd forgotten about it until now.
That's gonna drive me crazy. Was it on bad cattitude or Steve Kirsch? Or Forgotten Side of Medicine?
Okay, okay, point taken! But here's why you should still get your booster:
https://www.newworldhumor.com/p/7e18da16-44c1-4978-b5af-c1506b77d312
Should specify who the target of transparency is. Because they have already argued they didn't hide anything...from the FDA. If they tell everything to their partner in crime who just happens to hide it for them it is supposed to count as "transparancy". That transparency should be due to the American people and NOT a revolving door regulator already in the industry's pocket.
Maybe the didn't find criminal liability in Florida, but there are lawsuits in other states for criminal liability. Maybe Florida needs to look at their laws.
The courts are a pressure release valve to make sure you do not affect the system or the powerful. It is built to exhaust your time, money, and will, so you just give up and leave things alone. I explain deeper with some history of British common-law courts in my podcast here:
https://www.brighteon.com/fe07cd46-601f-41ca-bc14-3dcd57916253
Dr David Martin world renowned