5 Comments
User's avatar
Dr.Don Hall's avatar

There may have bern, however, that is secondary to the direct mfg. Warp(d) Speed … production and INTENTIONS

Expand full comment
Nancy G's avatar

I don’t believe they “prevented” the FBI from releasing this information. They were in on the con from the beginning!

Expand full comment
Lee Harding's avatar

Anyone using critical thinking skills at the time could see this was the most likely origin.

Expand full comment
PamelaDrew's avatar

"Rutgers University molecular biologist Richard Ebright, Ph.D., a critic of gain-of-function research, told The Defender the report “dismayed” but did not surprise him."

Huge disappointment that myth of synthetic clones used for ALL virology & vaccinology is still talked about as if Gain of Function exists outside RNA grown in E.coli w purity that can NEVER exist in nature.

Badly named Gain of Function is the ability for CRISPR keyboard gene jockeys to make huge quantities of DNA or RNA cheaply. It does NOT change the fidelity of RNA or add magical fidelity w a spike or other sequence. RNA can not pandemic.

Lets stop the fearmongering & get to the truth GoF is a lab tool not a conquest over Mo0ther Nature. Search NIH funded 2016 Review of GoF for a few terms like "however" that notes GoF clones Never reflect wild virus or Human Immune Response.. other fun terms "vaccine" "stockpile" "stakeholder" "pandemic plan" "WHO" "investment"

https://web.archive.org/web/20161206155142/http://www.gryphonscientific.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Risk-and-Benefit-Analysis-of-Gain-of-Function-Research-Final-Report.pdf

Expand full comment
ILoveLiberty's avatar

Covering up trails, pretending innocence, to keep the source/s protected. Fauci the rat snake belongs in public Nuremberg. No MIS information.

Expand full comment