Children under 5 who received the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines were more likely to become infected with COVID-19 than unvaccinated children who had natural immunity.
There is nothing surprising at all about this study. Nothing. It’s why the rest of the world (effectively) don’t boost children. Here’s another question: How many vaccinated children under 5 became seriously ill, hospitalized or died from COVID-19 (Eg not SARS-COV-2 infection) compared to unvaccinated? I suspect it was incredibly low. So low, that one would have to run massive trials to show statistical power. Therefore, one would also have to run massive safety trials in this same cohort, and there’s the rub.
You know that “virology” is a pseudo-science, but keep the big lie alive? Why?
Surely the best way for people to stop taking vaccines, is to realise there has never been a need for them, in the first place because no virus ever, has been isolated, or demonstrated to infect anything (except the minds of fiction writers everywhere).
I know RFK Jr thinks the masses, “can’t handle the truth”, but I think that is a gross underestimation of people’s intelligence.
Help free humanity from the bonds of institutional malevolence, please.
So babies and young kids who get mild infections if they even get them at all now actually get sicker because of the intervention alleged to prevent the infection in the first place. And they get all the risk of the intervention itself. Sounds great.
Sadly, the parents who are choosing to jab their kids at this point are the very parents who are going to believe that more covid infections means their kids need more jabs. "See, she keeps getting sick! She better stay up on her boosters!" 😭😭😭
And who knows what else they will get — the injections destroy the immune system, and no natural defence system means any illness can wreak havoc in the life of a cv19 injected child.
Alex Jones kept screaming the vaccine is the real bioweapon, but the sheep kept watching CNN.
There is nothing surprising at all about this study. Nothing. It’s why the rest of the world (effectively) don’t boost children. Here’s another question: How many vaccinated children under 5 became seriously ill, hospitalized or died from COVID-19 (Eg not SARS-COV-2 infection) compared to unvaccinated? I suspect it was incredibly low. So low, that one would have to run massive trials to show statistical power. Therefore, one would also have to run massive safety trials in this same cohort, and there’s the rub.
Why do you keep telling people this?
You know that “virology” is a pseudo-science, but keep the big lie alive? Why?
Surely the best way for people to stop taking vaccines, is to realise there has never been a need for them, in the first place because no virus ever, has been isolated, or demonstrated to infect anything (except the minds of fiction writers everywhere).
I know RFK Jr thinks the masses, “can’t handle the truth”, but I think that is a gross underestimation of people’s intelligence.
Help free humanity from the bonds of institutional malevolence, please.
Blessings,
Janey
So babies and young kids who get mild infections if they even get them at all now actually get sicker because of the intervention alleged to prevent the infection in the first place. And they get all the risk of the intervention itself. Sounds great.
Sadly, the parents who are choosing to jab their kids at this point are the very parents who are going to believe that more covid infections means their kids need more jabs. "See, she keeps getting sick! She better stay up on her boosters!" 😭😭😭
And who knows what else they will get — the injections destroy the immune system, and no natural defence system means any illness can wreak havoc in the life of a cv19 injected child.
OK, OK, but there's still reasons to get your kid boosted:
https://www.newworldhumor.com/p/7e18da16-44c1-4978-b5af-c1506b77d312
Do we know yet if all brands of jxx have dna in them? Do we know yet whether each brand had 3 versions? Placebo? Dis-ease? Death?