Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Loafergirl's avatar

Very disturbing indeed

Expand full comment
Jill's avatar

One of the main purposes of PPPs is to hide illegal government actions in the "private" sector, where supposedly, there is nothing anyone can do about it. I think the court already ruled in another case that the govt. cannot hide what they are doing by using private corporations, especially when those corporations hold a charter that restricts their actions.

Social media receives governments benefits. It is incredible that anyone would argue such censorship is legal. This censorship has been devastating to our society, pitting people against each other and stopping the free sharing of information. There is nothing legal about the govt. hiding its own clear censorship by using so called "private" entities.

The majority ruling is counterfactual and ignores the very real illegality and harm of censorship. Honestly, I find some of the SC's members inability to grasp reality and the rule of law, horrifying.

I have watched people suffer and die from the governments lies and stopping out the truth. I feel these are people who simply do not care about others, the rule of law or a strong society where open debate is the coin of the realm.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts