Discussion about this post

User's avatar
The doctor is out's avatar

They took symptoms out of the case definition in 2023, and the original was no good either in that it was incoherently broad. All products need to come off the market entirely and all policies relying on cases cancelled and the case definition vacated immediately. No loopholes.

The case definition is unusable on its face for private entities too. Regardless of what loopholes the language may suggest, universities are 100% liable for any policy requiring so-called covid products "because cases." PREP does not shield actions with no rational basis. A policy based on a case definition with no symptoms (and no medical or scientific justification given for removing symptoms) lacks a rational basis plain and simple.

Expand full comment
mejbcart's avatar

the covid jabs are NOT 'vaccines' and YOU ALL KNOW IT!!! They are ILLEGAL without human consent, and since you all won't admit the truth, that all becomes CRIMINAL! The fact that their mandates for military and those universities were put into place, means something about the 'vaccines'.. Since IT IS the GENE THERAPIES, your 'vaccines' as the cause of it all, why the gov is NOT PROHIBITING THEM COMPLETELY???? To put burden on universities? Do they wish illegal gene therapies will take over the entire humanity, without even that people know about it??? That's the DARKEST CRIMINAL ENDEAVOR YOU ALL ARE INVOLVED IN!!!!

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts